Review

QUANTITATIVE VS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGN: WHAT NIGERIAN COMMUNICATION SCHOLARS PREFER?

Obiaje Kris M.; Bellos Olufemi; Ojeka-John Rachael O; Oyedeji Kazeem A.; Talabi Felix O.; Oyinloye Oloyede; & Fadeyi Olajide I
Published:
December 18, 2023
Submitted:
January 8, 2026

Abstract

Research is an activity of knowing, with the core objectives of to find solutions to problems and find answers to questions through the application of a reliable and consistent procedure. To be reliable and consistent, research method must be accessible, transparent, systematic, verifiable, objective, transferable, cumulative and rigorous. It is useful for research method to meet the above stated criteria because as a public activity, research procedure must be clear in structure, in process and in outcome—such as the processes must be opened to scrutiny by others. Research in Communication and media studies is an ongoing activity and it is constantly evolving and moving from questions about the use of the medium to the questions of technological improvement of the medium to profitably serve the users of the medium, who are also constantly changing in terms of demographics, taste, orientation and values. The focus of this paper therefore, is to determine the research methodology which is most commonly used in communication and media studies. It is also to examine the influence of single and multiple authors in the choice of either the qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Employing descriptive quantitative design, the authors used content analysis as a tool to code and analysed the data set. Published scholarly articles available on Google scholar between 2020 and 2021 constituted the study population. Taro Yamane formula was used to draw a sample size of 392 from a population of 21,000. Findings showed that scholars in the field prefer quantitative methodology, and multiple authors were standard among the publications in the period under review. It is recommended that communication researchers explore the possibility of adopting alternative approaches other than quantitative methods. Regarding the debate on the number of authors as it concerns scholarly articles, it is submitted that more research is needed to ascertain further benefits of singular and multiple authors, aside from the obvious advantages from both sides currently being put forward.

Keywords

Research Methods, Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed-method, Communication scholars

Full Text

Author Information

Obiaje Kris M.; Bellos Olufemi; Ojeka-John Rachael O; Oyedeji Kazeem A.; Talabi Felix O.; Oyinloye Oloyede; & Fadeyi Olajide I

Article Actions

Download PDF

Article Metrics

Views 15
Downloads 6
Citations 0

Related Articles